{"created":"2023-06-20T13:08:24.474394+00:00","id":282,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"1290e9a0-dadc-46bd-9336-0ed22d7ccefb"},"_deposit":{"created_by":17,"id":"282","owners":[17],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"282"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:honan.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000282","sets":["44:76"]},"author_link":["206"],"item_2_alternative_title_1":{"attribute_name":"その他（別言語等）のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Samson the Agonist as a Projection of Milton's Selfhood"}]},"item_2_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2003-03-01","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"41","bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"20","bibliographic_titles":[{},{}]}]},"item_2_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_2_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"「士師記」の記述からわれわれが脳裏に描くサムソンの人間像とミルトンの『闘士サムソン』が読者に印象づけるサムソン像との間には、かなりの相違が認められる。士師サムソンは、腕力こそ強いが、わがままで、その行動は、しばしば幼児的、かつ、直情径行的である。それに対して、『闘士サムソン』に登場する主人公サムソンは、ペリシテ人に捕らわれて、眼をえぐりとられ、足枷をはめられて、過酷な労働を強いられる奴隷である。しかし、サムソンを悩ませているのは、この奴隷的境遇が彼に与える肉体的苦痛というよりは、むしろ、そのような境遇を招いた根本的な原因が彼自身の<人間的な弱さ>にあるとの自覚である。その自覚のゆえに、サムソンは痛恨・自責の念に苛まれているのである。サムソンは同胞の慰問者たち (コロス) の同情や、息子を身代金と引き換えに救出するという父親 (マノア) の提案を拒否する。彼は自分を裏切った妻 (ダリア) が現れて、夫との和解を求めても、その訴えをすら拒否する。このように、導入部に続く5つの場面のうち最初の3つを特徴づけるのは、サムソンの、頑なとも言える拒否行動である。第4の場面では、ペリシテ陣営の卑劣漢 (ハラファ) が現れ、サムソンを嘲笑する。サムソンも侮蔑的な言葉で応酬する。最後に、ペリシテ人の役人が現れ、サムソンを闘技場に召喚する。ところがサムソンは、最初こそ、拒否するが、最後には召喚に応じるのである。<拒絶>から<受諾>への主人公のこの転換をどう解釈すべきか?ここで、ミルトンが『闘士サムソン』を執筆した時期と動機が問題になる。執筆の時期と動機については、研究者の間で諸説があり、筆者の見解も憶測の域を出ないが、筆者はミルトンの初婚の躓きを重視したい。初婚の相手メアリが、新婚早々、里帰りをしたまま、夫のもとに帰ろうとしなかったのは1642年の夏である。再三の手紙による夫の帰宅要請をメアリが無視したことにミルトンは「大いに怒って」「離婚論」の執筆に着手したという (エドワード・フイリップス)。この時、ミルトンが痛感したであろう<女性不信>は「闘士サムソン」のダリラに対する激しい拒絶反応と無関係ではないと筆者は考える。ミルトンのメアリとの疎遠は、後日、彼女が夫に詫びを入れ、彼がこれを受け入れたことで一件落着を見る (1645)。拙論は、この間のミルトンの心理的推移を『闘士サムソン』の主人公の心境の変化と関連づけて解釈しようとするものである。サムソンがペリシテの役人の闘技場への出場命令を、最初は拒否しておきながら、最後には受諾したのはなぜか。筆者は、サムソンは役人の2度目の命令を受諾した時点ですでに、現実<拒絶>から現実<受容>へと精神の転換を遂げていたと考える。<理想>と<現実>の狭間で果敢に<理想>を追求したミルトンには、不可避的な<現実>に直面した時、これを一種の諦念をもって甘受する度量があった。メアリとの初婚の躓きはミルトンに癒しがたい精神的苦痛を与えたが、彼が妻との和解に同意したのは、人間ミルトンの度量の大きさを示すものである。一方、自らの<愚かさ>が招いた過失が己れ自身の精神的未成熟に起因することを自覚したサムソンは、闘技場に向う直前になって、はじめて崇高な人間の姿を見せる。ミルトンと同様にサムソンもまた成熟に達したのである。サムソンはミルトン自身の自己投影なのである。There is a great deal of divergence between the image of Samson conjured up in our minds from reading Judges : chapters 13 to 16 and that which strikes us when we read Samson Agonistes. Samson as depicted in those chapters of Judges is a young man of extraordinary physical strength whose mentality, however, is so immature-almost as childish as a spoilt kid-and whose behaviour is as impulsive as that of a hot-headed rough-neck. By contrast, Samson as we see him in Milton's tragedy is a miserable slave who, with his eyes plucked out and his feet fettered, was forced to labour in a mill. What torments him, however, is not so much his bodily pains as his mental or spiritual agonies resulting from the realization of his own past folly in revealing the secret of his strength to a woman who was bent on betraying him into the hands of his Philistine foes. Comforters (in the role of a chorus in a Greek tragedy) come to visit and console him with sympathetic comments. But Samson rejects their consolations. Then comes his old father Manoa. who, aghast at the plight of his son, offers to arrange ransom with the Philistine lords. After Manoa comes Samson's wife, who had beguiled him. She pleads with him to accept her proposals for reconciliation. Samson gives vent to his anger, rebuking her in the harshest of all words. Then Harapha comes round and challenges Samson with his bombast. Then, a Philistine officer comes to summon Samson to the \"agon\" or \"fighting arena\", not for the sake of a fighting as such, but for the sake of providing fun for the Philistine spectators in celebration of a feast dedicated to their god Dagon. Samson first refuses to comply, but upon a Philistine messenger coming a second time to fetch him, he does comply with their orders. What has made Samson change his mind? The question may best be answered in terms of the changes Milton himself went through during the time his wife Mary stayed away from him. Milton's distrust of womanhood tormented him all the while, but when Mary came back to him in 1645 and begged him to forgive her for her past misconduct, Milton, though he may initially have had some difficulty in pardoning his wife, did pardon her after all. This course of domestic affairs may suggest a gradual maturing of Milton's mentality, and some such maturing process is seen also in the change of mind which Samson had gone through. Samson's final acceptance of the Philistine orders to present himself in the arena may be taken as an indication that at that point he had already passed from the stage of \"rejecting\" everything according to his own principles, to that of \"accepting\" something, if not all even if that may compromise his principles. In that sense, Samson may be thought of as a projection of Milton's maturing selfhood","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_2_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA11526999","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_2_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1346-034X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_2_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"206","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2013-06-26"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KJ00004198738.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.6 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"KJ00004198738.pdf","url":"https://honan.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/282/files/KJ00004198738.pdf"},"version_id":"d9b15f82-e482-48c0-98f9-127dfff49cb9"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"自己投影としての「闘士サムソン」","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"自己投影としての「闘士サムソン」"},{"subitem_title":"Samson the Agonist as a Projection of Milton's Selfhood","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"2","owner":"17","path":["76"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2013-06-26"},"publish_date":"2013-06-26","publish_status":"0","recid":"282","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["自己投影としての「闘士サムソン」"],"weko_creator_id":"17","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-20T13:14:58.107257+00:00"}